-
Claude 3 Sparks Joy and Confusion: Users like @justjumper_, @louisgv, and @arsoban express excitement for the new Claude 3, with @arsoban noting it outperforms GPT-4 in some tests. In contrast, @alexatallah assures that even the “experimental” version of Claude 3 will go live, responding to @wikipediadotnet and others’ queries.
-
Pricing Puzzles Everyone: A conversation about Claude 3’s pricing ensues with users like @oti5, @voidlunaa, and @xiaoqianwx. @voidlunaa finds Opus’s price jump from Sonnet bizarre, suggesting that it might be priced like a physical service due to @wikipediadotnet’s comic observation.
-
Interaction Issues with New Models: User @fillysteps reports getting blank responses from all Claude models except the 2.0 beta and suspects being banned, while others like @wikipediadotnet and @antoineross inquire about pricing and implementation details. @louisgv troubleshoots, suggesting issues might arise from region blocks or using unsupported features like image inputs.
-
Mixed Reception for Claude’s Literary Talents: While some, such as @khadame and @wikipediadotnet, praise Claude 3 Sonnet and Opus for their writing quality, others like @edgyfluff report repeated, unwanted auto-generated responses, with @wikipediadotnet offering troubleshooting tips.
-
Undercurrent of Model Comparisons and Costs: Discussions on model comparisons are rampant, with mentions of Claude 3 outperforming others like Gemini Ultra and GPT-4 by @arsoban, @voidlunaa, and @followereternal. Concerns like @mhmm0879’s about real vs. predicted costs of model usage indicate a need for clarity on pricing structures, while @alexatallah clarifies tokenization issues might be at fault.